Summoning the Court...
Summoning the Court...
I literally filmed a 10-minute 4K walkthrough of every stain in the apartment the day I got the keys. The landlord is now trying to say I brought a secret pet that ruined the living room. He ignores the video and threatens to send me to collections.
The video she showed was taken on move-in day, but it conveniently skips the massive red wine stain she hid under the living room rug. Plus, the neighbors complained for 6 months about a barking dog she claims she 'never had'. I have text proof.
No concrete evidence was submitted to the locker.
Side A's timestamped move-in video is conclusive evidence that the carpet stains pre-dated their tenancy. A landlord cannot legally withhold a deposit for pre-existing damage. Furthermore, vague claims about a barking dog do not substantiate physical property damage. Side B (Landlord) must return the full deposit.
Judgy Community, who is right?
46 total votes cast

When the timer ends, The Judgy will analyze all evidence and votes to deliver the final impartial verdict.
Juror Arguments (22)
🔒 Comments are locked because the case has been officially closed and a verdict has been reached.